-
Website
http://washingtonindependent.com/ -
Original page
http://washingtonindependent.com/18503/why-closing-gitmo-isnt-enough -
Subscribe
All Comments -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
nbc1
409 comments · 2 points
-
RedGraham
360 comments · 6 points
-
naturalizedcitizen
519 comments · 12 points
-
jjfitz
336 comments · 18 points
-
24AheadDotCom
327 comments · 27 points
-
-
Popular Threads
-
Orly Taitz Smacked Down: Birther Lawsuit Dismissed
1 week ago · 2013 comments
-
Four Weeks Later, Senate Unanimously Passes Bill Extending Unemployment Benefits
3 days ago · 225 comments
-
House Passes Extended Unemployment Benefits
3 days ago · 106 comments
-
Unemployment Tops 10 Percent
2 days ago · 47 comments
-
Orly Taitz, Master Attorney
3 weeks ago · 763 comments
-
Orly Taitz Smacked Down: Birther Lawsuit Dismissed
Actually, if remember right, the Boumedienne decision to grant habeas corpus rights DID extend beyond Gitmo. You might want to look at that more closely, though, as I am not entirely sure. But what is certain: everyone is worried about Cuba and missing this real issue--Bagram is the new Gitmo.
The military having participated in war, having watched their fellow fighters die, having been sniped at, bombed and ambushed are hardly objective in the administration of those suspected of doing such.
The military commanded by a "war president" and having spent a lifetime of following orders is hardly the body that should be holding, interrogating, or rendering to another country a person arbitrarily or not named as an "enemy combatant" by the Commander in Chief.
If we as a Country don't apply OUR Justice system to ALL prisoners we as a Country suffer. Its always ease to create another "us and them" category of enemies. Once we compromise our standards and our justice to meet a "new" or "different" or "threatening national security" group we degrade our moral position in the world.
We need to remember that just as a corporation has a huge investment and value in its name, logo and "good will", so does the US. When you lose the moral high ground you might win the battle but you lose the war.