<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>The Washington Independent - Latest Comments in Waxman to Greenspan: Were You Wrong?</title><link>http://washingtonindependent.disqus.com/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Oct 2008 06:54:39 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Waxman to Greenspan: Were You Wrong?</title><link>http://washingtonindependent.com/14453/waxman-to-greenspan-were-you-wrong#comment-3270974</link><description>You sound pretty far gone. I don't know if you can be helped. In a nutshell, nearly everything governments does, it does very poorly. The less government the better. Sure we need some, for our military, roads ect. but for the most part the less, the better!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Greg</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 24 Oct 2008 06:54:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Waxman to Greenspan: Were You Wrong?</title><link>http://washingtonindependent.com/14453/waxman-to-greenspan-were-you-wrong#comment-3260485</link><description>What Greenspan is saying is that the banks have backed themselves into a corner with derivatives and the population has been stripped of its wealth. Even though he knows this, he can't allow his train of thought to take the next logical step, which is, instead of giving the banks more money, give the money back to the population.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://ewebsmith.com/Finance/therealproblem.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://ewebsmith.com/Finance/therealproblem.html&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://ewebsmith.com/bus/taxpayers.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://ewebsmith.com/bus/taxpayers.html&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">websmith</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2008 15:00:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Waxman to Greenspan: Were You Wrong?</title><link>http://washingtonindependent.com/14453/waxman-to-greenspan-were-you-wrong#comment-3259740</link><description>WHy don't you link an article to the huffington post for justification also. Fannie and Freddie were deeply at the root of the financial problems. Things like Credit Default Swaps just made the problem bigger than it should have been. If private banks did not adhere to CRA rules they would be penalized. How about you insert some VERY pertinent facts into your analysis.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Cryos</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2008 14:24:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Waxman to Greenspan: Were You Wrong?</title><link>http://washingtonindependent.com/14453/waxman-to-greenspan-were-you-wrong#comment-3256579</link><description>Who do they think they are fooling?  This was all by design.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Watch this video:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-515319560256183936" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-515319...&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">elmanyon</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2008 13:25:58 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Waxman to Greenspan: Were You Wrong?</title><link>http://washingtonindependent.com/14453/waxman-to-greenspan-were-you-wrong#comment-3256472</link><description>So "Liberal" essentially assumes that "We The People" are self-disciplined enough to not need a micromanaging authoritarian government to interfere in our personal decisions. Conservatives think "Liberal" is evil and can't work.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Likewise, "Neoliberal" essentially assumes that Big Business is restrained enough to not need an authoritarian regulatory government. Conservatives think "Neoliberal" is good and are willing to gamble the health of the nation on it.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Why is it that the inherent evil in humans is suddenly ignored when the pretend Big Business is a person? It don't add up.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Gnarlodious</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2008 13:20:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Waxman to Greenspan: Were You Wrong?</title><link>http://washingtonindependent.com/14453/waxman-to-greenspan-were-you-wrong#comment-3255858</link><description>Greenspan thought deregulation would bring a self governess in the banking system. These greedy CEO’s were supposed to police each other, not con each other.  Deregulation bought out the worst of Wall Street, and America was pillaged.  This greed and neglect of self governess have bought on the worst financial storm that the world has ever faced.  Once the dust settles, America should band together and bring on a class action suit against the actions of these CEO’s.  According to Greenspan, “believed lending institutions would do a good job of protecting their shareholders” instead, they profited, jump ship and left the American tax payers holding the bag (i.e. &lt;a href="http://www.BuyMyHouseBeforeTheBankTakesIt.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.BuyMyHouseBeforeTheBankTakesIt.com&lt;/a&gt;).</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Bill</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2008 13:01:01 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>