Hello! The Washington Independent is using DISQUS, a powerful comment system, to manage its comments. Learn more.
Community Page
- washingtonindependent.com Jump to website »
-
Subscribe -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
Popular Threads
-
Recent Comments
- Oh please! I've lived in the U.S. most of my life (with the exception of U.S. military service overseas for 3 years) and I've known for at least the last two decades that the United States...
- "Piece of Shit? It's i before e except after c, dumb fuck Signed a Vietnam Era 11/B (if you don't know what that is, shut up) who is from Texas and most probably can snap you in half....
- They have the power, but like you say in the end, we vote for then so WE have the power. People who seek to become politicians, and seek to stay in power as politicians have a different motivation,...
- Gads where do I start! The accumulative methane in the Arctic region may be more responsible for the loss of long term arctic ice that CO2, along with the additional warming of areas that used to...
- He's right. He's just pointing the finger in the wrong direction. It wasn't excessive liberalism that produced the so called "patriot" act that has led us down the road to...
Jump to original thread »
The morning’s news of the death of Tom Lantos — Democrat of Cal
... Continue reading »
1 year ago
He may have served his Jewish constituents loyalty to Israel well in his office of public trust but he did not act on or serve the once admired principles of the United States.
How does one judge a man like this?
Do we add his good works and then subtract the lives he has cost in the Isr-Pal conflict he supported all thru the years?
Not to speak ill of the dead let us just say he was a man of selective morality.
I don't know how to judge selective morality.