DISQUS

emjayinc · 1 year ago

Appears your whole take needs, oh horrors, revision: use of NDU, liberal narrative, linking various names and themes known to draw a knee jerk reaction in some quarters, and so on. Starts with the subject itself - despite your repetition, Collins' work was/is not an NDU study on Iraq. Or maybe you should assign B3 to those 2 (of 5?) prescient McClatchy "reporters". Or just check your sources through SWJ.

spencer_ackerman · 1 year ago

If I was trying to conceal something, why would I link to the SWJ post? You need to take a deep breath and think things through.

gbarrows103 · 1 year ago

good post

callmeethel · 1 year ago

re: lib narrative on iraq, and ackerman's signing of the open letter in response to the last dem debate.



Who isn't glad that the moderators didn't ask the anti-war Obama why he's more anxious to serve Nancy 'impeachment is off the table' Pelosi than he--a would-be Commander in Chief, remember--is anxious to serve the troops (and their rights to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness)?



The secret to John McCain's successful candidacy (whether or not he wins) is that if the anti-war Barack Obama had ever been Commander in Chief material, nobody could've stopped Obama from ending the war or from dying trying.



Suppose the moderators of the debate had asked war voter Hillary Clinton whether she believes she's able to impeach Bush without presenting evidence that would demand her own impeachment, and whether a "No" anser would mean that Clinton's NY constituents--the ones who'd end the war by impeaching Bush--are without representation.