<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>The Washington Independent - Latest Comments in Spying Law Challenged</title><link>http://washingtonindependent.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://washingtonindependent.disqus.com/spying_law_challenged/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Jun 2010 03:21:02 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Spying Law Challenged</title><link>http://washingtonindependent.com/593/spying-law-challenged#comment-54484426</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks for this interesting post,i like it. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">adidas originals</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 04 Jun 2010 03:21:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Spying Law Challenged</title><link>http://washingtonindependent.com/593/spying-law-challenged#comment-1790594</link><description>&lt;p&gt;We can be fairly confident that a majority of the supremes will not see it the way the ACLU sees it.  That is why it never should have been enacted in the first place.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">amiblue</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2008 11:54:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Spying Law Challenged</title><link>http://washingtonindependent.com/593/spying-law-challenged#comment-1790595</link><description>&lt;p&gt;This is what Barack was talking about, when he said that he would let the courts decide on this.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;It makes sense to me now, because I was very upset that he chose to vote for it.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">lvdragonlady</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2008 07:37:43 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Spying Law Challenged</title><link>http://washingtonindependent.com/593/spying-law-challenged#comment-1790596</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Stories that I imagine would have been much harder to write without a reasonable expectation of private international phone communication:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;the CIA black prison story&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;the financial records data mining story&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Anyone who thinks those stories being published is not in the public interest is not paying attention.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I am not sure that this law is not a de facto first amendment violation as well of freedom of the press.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;In the words of a "great American": "Trust, but verify."&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">schnick</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2008 04:28:34 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>