<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>The Washington Independent - Latest Comments in Spitzer&amp;#8217;s Lost Moment</title><link>http://washingtonindependent.disqus.com/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 18:39:59 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Spitzer&amp;#8217;s Lost Moment</title><link>http://washingtonindependent.com/6718/the-would-be-savior#comment-2811414</link><description>How can we possible judge Spitzer when prostitution is so available on the net. I think you just need to look at sites like &lt;a href="http://www.tnareview.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;www.tnareview.com&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href="http://eros.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;eros.com&lt;/a&gt; to know how public it really is. Not making it legal is the problem</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Tommy</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 18:39:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Spitzer&amp;#8217;s Lost Moment</title><link>http://washingtonindependent.com/6718/the-would-be-savior#comment-2527176</link><description>I would argue that Spitzer represented very well those old style of values.  There were no higher moral standards, greater ethical writs, or any other code followed to a more strict fashion, even in Victorian England.  In the "good old days", people could talk and represent one line while living another.  Spitzer was the embodiment of this fact as was John Edwards... as was Thomas Jefferson, Teddy Roosevelt, FDR, Truman, Regan, etc., etc.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jaycal</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2008 19:58:19 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>