The Washington Independent - Latest Comments in special needs

Re: special needs

ralph lauren outlet — Sat, 16 Jul 2011 13:26:46 -0000

enjoyed reading your nice blog. I see you offer priceless info. Stumbled into this blog by chance but I'm sure glad I clicked on that link. You definitely answered all the questions I've been dying to answer for some time now. Will definitely come back for more of this.

Re: special needs

lacoste online store — Mon, 04 Jul 2011 10:19:22 -0000

YES i agree with you... "how GOPs who advocate less govt"

Re: special needs

lacoste outlet — Mon, 04 Jul 2011 05:34:51 -0000

What about the blogs you read that you value the most? Do you consider TechCrunchto be trustworthy? Why or why not? What about Jeff Jarvis’s Buzzmachine? The blogs you value, do you also find them trustworthy representatives?

Re: special needs

lacoste polo shirts — Sun, 03 Jul 2011 08:40:50 -0000

"Anti-Abortion" en I think we must pay attention to that...

Re: special needs

Guest — Sun, 03 Jul 2011 03:35:26 -0000

I'm very agree with you , Friend .:)

Re: special needs

lacoste man polo shirts — Fri, 08 Apr 2011 14:33:02 -0000

what I’ve been able to do is kind of manifest my commitment to life

Re: special needs

lacoste polo — Wed, 29 Dec 2010 01:49:20 -0000

What is glaringly obvious is that these children have been neglected by their mother. Her oldest son Track abused alchohol and drugs, vandalized property and dropped out of high school. Bristol's own alchoholic adventures are well-chronicled in photos on my sp ace pages and the baby is seen being schlepped around late at night and dumped either with an aide or the two other lacoste polo girls who, if you will notice their body language, crave their mother's attention.

Why aren't the children in school? Is education a "value" that they just don't need up in Alaska? Where is a nanny? A private tutor, and aide or lacoste polophysical/occupational therapist for that sweet little baby?

Re: special needs

louis vuitton outlet — Sun, 28 Nov 2010 22:08:14 -0000

I agree with you.too.

Re: special needs

moncler jackets — Fri, 12 Nov 2010 21:35:15 -0000

Anti-Abortion,i support

Re: special needs

discount Louis vuitton — Fri, 03 Sep 2010 00:46:20 -0000

“John [McCain] and I have a vision of America where every innocent life counts,” Palin told a crowd at a high-school football stadium in Roanoke, Va., the next day. “Where everyone has a chance to contribute and every child is cherished. And that’s the spirit I want to bring to Washington, D.C.”

Re: special needs

Louis Vuitton Sobe Clutch — Fri, 20 Aug 2010 11:26:51 -0000

She would rather have a vile rapist go completely free than use a pill to prevent 2-cells from being implanted in a raped woman's uterus.

Re: special needs

nike shox — Wed, 09 Jun 2010 21:54:13 -0000

Thans for you share the article.

Re: special needs

mbt sandals — Wed, 02 Jun 2010 11:46:26 -0000

Thank you for your sharing.I'm very interested in it.

Re: special needs

supra shoes — Sat, 29 May 2010 02:21:55 -0000

thanks for your share!!

Re: special needs

mbt shoes — Tue, 18 May 2010 21:08:08 -0000

Thanks for you share the article.Good!

Re: special needs

annie — Sun, 09 Nov 2008 22:30:58 -0000

"My body, my business. The government or anyone else should have no say in what I choose to do with it and with what is inside it."

But what's inside you is a human being. So yes, the gov. can say what you do with it as it's purpose is to ensure LIFE, liberty.......for all. If we have laws to protect babies outside the womb, why can we not see that the laws also apply to those inside the womb. I don't see the difference!

Re: special needs

janemas — Sat, 01 Nov 2008 21:33:13 -0000

I didn't say or imply she had a test done to see if the fetus was Downs. I'm saying she wanted to know if her life was in danger so should could have a quiet abortion if it were. In doing the test she found out the unborn was Downs which is no threat to life. I know many women who are democrats, even atheists who keep their Down baby. She did nothing special, something she parades on the stage as if it is a Christian right-wing Republican value.

Re: special needs

Nin — Fri, 31 Oct 2008 16:12:09 -0000

I have watched the way she whips that baby around. She will carry him across the stage, show the crowd and dump him on the other side of the stage. He is a prop;

Watch her body language with her daughters at the two hockey games for example. It's the Sarah show. The children are invisible, until they are needed in a photo op.

What is glaringly obvious is that these children have been neglected by their mother. Her oldest son Track abused alchohol and drugs, vandalized property and dropped out of high school. Bristol's own alchoholic adventures are well-chronicled in photos on my sp ace pages and the baby is seen being schlepped around late at night and dumped either with an aide or the two other girls who, if you will notice their body language, crave their mother's attention.

Why aren't the children in school? Is education a "value" that they just don't need up in Alaska? Where is a nanny? A private tutor, and aide or physical/occupational therapist for that sweet little baby?

Lastly, her personal story is suspicious. In every instance where she has climbed up the ladder, she has stabbed in the back each of her mentors, all the way to the top. If she were to serve as veep, I doubt seriously she will be looking to stay within the margins, but rather will do her best to marginalize her own boss.

Palin has yet to release her medical record, which she promised early last week. Today is Friday. The election is Tuesday. What are you hiding Sarah? Treatment for depression? Plastic surgery? The details of Trig?

Re: special needs

AE PHX — Thu, 30 Oct 2008 21:41:56 -0000

I guess, Andy, that makes you the hillbilly, doesn't it?

Re: special needs

AE PHX — Thu, 30 Oct 2008 21:39:46 -0000

You need professional help

Re: special needs

XYZ — Thu, 30 Oct 2008 21:34:19 -0000

So what's your point?

Re: special needs

IUS — Thu, 30 Oct 2008 21:31:40 -0000

Planned Parenthood kills babies and injures their mothers. Women in crisis deserve better than PP and abortion.

Re: special needs

IUS — Thu, 30 Oct 2008 21:28:59 -0000

Margaret Sanger was a racist and a fan of Hitler. Read her material before you comment next time...

Re: special needs

IUS — Thu, 30 Oct 2008 21:22:09 -0000

Most definitely keep the baby. What crime did the baby commit? None. What crime did the father commit? Rape. It is completely unjust that the baby should get the death sentence (abortion) because of the crime of the father (rape). The abortion would not have undone the crime of rape. It would have just added another crime -- abortion -- a dead child.

Re: special needs

brodey — Thu, 30 Oct 2008 18:35:41 -0000

Horrendous! You need to volunteer to work with children with downs. They are wonderful, loving, trusting people. How can you make such an ugly comment, are you projecting?