-
Website
http://washingtonindependent.com/ -
Original page
http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=15487 -
Subscribe
All Comments -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
nbc1
409 comments · 2 points
-
naturalizedcitizen
1485 comments · 29 points
-
jjfitz
349 comments · 18 points
-
24AheadDotCom
363 comments · 28 points
-
Anteni
600 comments · 35 points
-
-
Popular Threads
-
Pawlenty: Palin’s More Qualified Than Obama
1 day ago · 97 comments
-
Sean Hannity Winks at the Birthers
1 week ago · 918 comments
-
Conservatives Not Ready to Embrace Party-Switcher
5 hours ago · 6 comments
-
Birtherism in the GOP
1 week ago · 317 comments
-
Ensign: Health Reform Is Unconstitutional
10 hours ago · 7 comments
-
Pawlenty: Palin’s More Qualified Than Obama
I mean, why fix an automatic election issue.
Now I do agree there are other issues in this election, but as I have said all along, people really don't realize they have no choice. Disheartening isn't it. Neither are quite what they seem. I would not however call someone with 5 children saerving a "selfish" agenda when it comes to their policy on children. I'd say she has a much better view on this topic than you or I ever will. How many babies have you and I had between us? NONE. So let's stop talking for them, and let them talk themselves about it. We seem to want them to fill that roll, well, their opinions should matter for something when it comes to that.
SHOULD HAVE pursued with her children while on the trail? A nanny? I find women who are really outspoken on other mothers approaches (short of child abuse issues) typically the ones that have the plank in their eye while complaining about the splinter in someone elses eye. Easy to always find fault with someone else, but never address your own inequites.
Enough money? Seems to have pretty humble roots to me, and while she has a nifty salary, I doubt her money is stretching much farther than mine. My six figure income doesn't go all that far anymore. And for us to presume we know wxactly why she would turn down funding for special needs children is ludicrous. Much like the big boys in the political arena. They love to point out who did or didn't vote for this or that. But they never talk about the spending bill attachments that pertain to things they could not vote for, but are only sold they didn't support the name on the bill.......a little short sighted vakay. I guress you'd be ok if she voted for the bill if it also said you were also required to house 4 illegal aliens in your home.
Palin supports having babies even in cases of rape and incest. Thats a fact
So the next time she's going to give a speech about special needs children, she should read some of those magazines or books she couldn't remember the name of when being interviewed by Couric.
But what's inside you is a human being. So yes, the gov. can say what you do with it as it's purpose is to ensure LIFE, liberty.......for all. If we have laws to protect babies outside the womb, why can we not see that the laws also apply to those inside the womb. I don't see the difference!
I did this already, and so have many of my friends, male and female.
Make an Honorary Donation in Sarah Palin's name to Planned Parenthood.
When the donation is made, PP will send a thank you card to Ms. Palin.
They ask for an address so, use the McCain base address (found on the website).
You help out Planned Parenthood and you sock it to Palin in on fell swoop.
There's no need to put women through the inevitable tortures of choosing, mentally or physically.
If you've never been on that path, you can't speak as if you've worn those shoes.
ProChoice is not about abortion as a birth control, it's about avoiding that possibilty, safely.
ProChoice activists want to avoid abortion as much as anyone else and by teaching sex-ed the hope is that it will never come to that.
There's no denying that we ALL discover sex one way or another but, in these modern times, with
all we know about disease, birth rates, over population, poverty, rape, incest, reproductive health...
why in god's name would we deny our own flesh and blood the right to this information?
To make them suffer? To tell them 'I told you so'? Because you're so uptight about your own sexuality that you can't accept that millions of other people out there have great sex, safely?
These are contemporary issues, let's get on the bandwagon and be responsible already!
For our kids and future kids, planned or not.
Awareness and responsibility. Because abstinence just isn't working.
(Just look at Bristol palin)
Sanger has umpteen stories of the sufferings and of women from botched backroom abortions.
Here in Canada,which some of you Americans may see from your yard,we have honoured Dr. Henry Morgentaler with the Order of Canada award. He went to jail for us. He had compassion for us and he performed safe abortions for us.
Did the Right to Lifers protest about such a prestigious award going to him? You betcha'!
One Catholic priest even handed back his own award as a protest even tho" his church recently had to apologize for the treatment of First Nations children at the Residential schools,rapes included.
Has Ms Palin never read this book or know of the history of womens' struggles with undesirable pregnancies?
What is so very disturbing to me is their belief that the state will somehow care for all these unwanted babies when America has so many children living in poverty. The world has a huge log of babies and children not being cared for, be it from war,AIDS, diseases,abandonment,family crises.
ProLIFERS should and could be putting their energies there.
http://librarymedia.org/health/Titles/operacion...
I think that having too many children is also vile. There are too many people in the world. This is religious fanaticism to the extreme. Having a child with Downs syndrome is horrendous. This child will have a terrible life. There is no reason to subject these poor fetuses to a incredibly horrible life.
An I say all this despite being adopted before Roe v. Wade.
"Having a child with Downs syndrome is horrendous. This child will have a terrible life. There is no reason to subject these poor fetuses to a incredibly horrible life."
UNTIL YOU HAVE CHOSEN TO HAVE A CHILD WITH DOWN SYNDROME, SHUT YOUR MOUTH! My son is wonderful and has a wonderful life. This comment only shows your utter lack of any type of knowledge, but it DOES show your ignorance on the subject!
Shame on you for saying that! Although as far as evidence has shown me Palin is not leader and an inadequate politician, many of these children live wonderful lives and bring great joy to their families. What you said is not a type of thinking or believing Pro-Choice people would utter. Your comments are uncalled for no matter how hypocritical Palin is. Attacking an innocent child is uncalled for. I do believe Palin is a regular mom like many who LET HER KIDS drink underage and should be ashamed of herself and stop acting like she's a perfect mother, but you were way out of line.
She would rather have a vile rapist go completely free than use a pill to prevent 2-cells from being implanted in a raped woman's uterus.
And the fact that we were both raised in an Assemblies of God church (but I am an Independent voter), well, I think she uses her faith as more of a tool than anything else.
Plus, I was trained as a professional model and, believe me, given this woman's background in 'pageantry,' she'll use whatever she can to get where she wants to go!
Sarah Palin might be 'pro-life' but she does not believe in the government programs that provide a life for those children that are born into to straitened circumstances.
No way am I voting for McCain/Palin.
Absolutely no way.
ObamaObamaObamaObamaObamaObamaObamaObamaObamaObamaObamaObamaObamaObamaObamaObamaObamaObamaObamaObamaObamaObamaObamaObamaObamaObamaObamaObamaObamaObamaObamaObamaObamaObamaObamaObamaObamaObamaObamaObamaObamaObamaObamaObamaObamaObamaObamaObamaObamaObamaObamaObamaObamaObamaObamaObamaObamaObamaObamaObamaObamaObamaObamaObamaObamaObamaObamaObamaObamaObamaObamaObamaObamaObamaObamaObamaObamaObamaObamaObamaObama
Watch her body language with her daughters at the two hockey games for example. It's the Sarah show. The children are invisible, until they are needed in a photo op.
What is glaringly obvious is that these children have been neglected by their mother. Her oldest son Track abused alchohol and drugs, vandalized property and dropped out of high school. Bristol's own alchoholic adventures are well-chronicled in photos on my sp ace pages and the baby is seen being schlepped around late at night and dumped either with an aide or the two other girls who, if you will notice their body language, crave their mother's attention.
Why aren't the children in school? Is education a "value" that they just don't need up in Alaska? Where is a nanny? A private tutor, and aide or physical/occupational therapist for that sweet little baby?
Lastly, her personal story is suspicious. In every instance where she has climbed up the ladder, she has stabbed in the back each of her mentors, all the way to the top. If she were to serve as veep, I doubt seriously she will be looking to stay within the margins, but rather will do her best to marginalize her own boss.
Palin has yet to release her medical record, which she promised early last week. Today is Friday. The election is Tuesday. What are you hiding Sarah? Treatment for depression? Plastic surgery? The details of Trig?