<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>The Washington Independent - Latest Comments in Siegelman Released</title><link>http://washingtonindependent.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://washingtonindependent.disqus.com/siegelman_released/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sun, 14 Nov 2010 22:39:48 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Siegelman Released</title><link>http://washingtonindependent.com/1862/siegelman-released#comment-97188207</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Can DOJ prevent him from testifying? It's seems that Mukasey would rather take a pointed stick to the eyes rather than have this aired at a committee; the question is, can he?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt; i agree with you, buddy.&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">moncler jackets</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 14 Nov 2010 22:39:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Siegelman Released</title><link>http://washingtonindependent.com/1862/siegelman-released#comment-1789004</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Can DOJ prevent him from testifying? It's seems that Mukasey would rather take a pointed stick to the eyes rather than have this aired at a committee; the question is, can he?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">strangely_enough</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2008 14:05:15 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>