The Washington Independent - Latest Comments in Obama’s Risky Pakistan Strategy

Re: Obama’s Risky Pakistan Strategy

Ray Ban Aviator — Wed, 18 May 2011 23:12:52 -0000

Ray Ban Caravan
rosetta stone japanese
Ray Ban Cockpit
rosetta stone language
the rosetta stone
rosetta stone spanish
rosetta stone

Re: Obama’s Risky Pakistan Strategy

air max 2011 — Thu, 28 Apr 2011 23:32:13 -0000

air maxes 2011 is a popular clothing item in Hip Hop Culture.
air max was intended as a successor to the Air Max.
air max 2011 was reissued taking its name from the year.
christian louboutin often replicated and sold on the Internet for a small fraction of cost.
burberry handbags was wearing the uniform color matching team
coach outlet potential of the great carry forward.

Re: Obama’s Risky Pakistan Strategy

cheng — Wed, 13 Apr 2011 02:45:47 -0000

We are currently one of the fastest growing shopping destinations for true religion jeans
products true regilion canada. With a singular focus on shopping, we offer shoppers easy-to-use search tools, engaging content and time saving navigation, along with superb customer service and unbeatable product prices,
Supra Footwear ,
Louis Vuitton Bags and
beats by dre all in one place.
In today's cluttered online world, smart consumers demand simple and easy shopping features that take the stress out of online shopping, lead them straight to the
true religion outlet
they're seeking, while saving them time and money.

Re: Obama’s Risky Pakistan Strategy

discount Louis vuitton — Fri, 03 Sep 2010 02:02:00 -0000

All experts interviewed for this piece agreed on two points: first, the preference by far would be to induce the Pakistanis to take action against Al Qaeda themselves; second, U.S. incursions into Pakistan need to remain limited.

Re: Obama’s Risky Pakistan Strategy

louis vuitton — Sat, 07 Aug 2010 06:27:56 -0000

then u force retaliation when God alone knows Pakistan has neither the means nor the force to take on the US if it gets down to it. Sinply, why if we can't make love do we HAVE to provoke war??

Re: Obama’s Risky Pakistan Strategy

Guest — Fri, 27 Mar 2009 18:05:17 -0000

The user deleted this comment.

Re: Obama’s Risky Pakistan Strategy

Immi — Mon, 03 Nov 2008 23:58:21 -0000

Ok heres the thing. Obama may be responsible for american lives, but Kiyani is respnsible for Pakistani ones. Yes, they count as much as anyone's anywhere. By constantly making these kinds of remarks, first Obama and then Palin (which REALLY hurt, not) your govt officials make this a nameless, faceless war. Americans are dying and that is a tragedy, but I reiterate so are Pakistanis and that is a tragedy too. If Obama has to ;take us out' as he so quaintly puts it, then u force retaliation when God alone knows Pakistan has neither the means nor the force to take on the US if it gets down to it. Sinply, why if we can't make love do we HAVE to provoke war??

Re: Obama’s Risky Pakistan Strategy

USAR Vet — Mon, 06 Oct 2008 13:19:39 -0000

Cross-border raids alone absolutely would be destabilizing - many of the tribes and people of Afghanistan might forgive us, but the tribes more closely allied with their Pakistani brethren and the Pakistani peoples in the FATA and NWFP would condemn it. If cross-border raids could be combined with effective development activities in the FATA and NWFP provinces, that would be a different matter. This obviously is no easy task and vulnerable to many, many problems. Our greatest challenge and greatest hope, however, is to build a stable, civil society that has hope for a future grounded in both respect for their traditions and capabilities to grow peacefully in a modern, globalized society.

Re: Obama’s Risky Pakistan Strategy

Airborne — Sat, 04 Oct 2008 23:20:47 -0000

Am I dreaming or aren't we already attacking positions well into Pakistan?

Re: Obama’s Risky Pakistan Strategy

ufred — Sat, 04 Oct 2008 14:18:16 -0000

For how many years and how much per annum has been given to Pakistan by the US? How much over the last thirty years has gone to the Pakistani military in cash, weapons, equipment, and training?

Re: Obama’s Risky Pakistan Strategy

Billa — Fri, 03 Oct 2008 16:12:05 -0000

US war of terror strategy is full of double standards like any other policy. One one hand
US has been critical of the negotiations Pakistan had with militants in Waziristan and
on the other hand they are officially talking to Talibans with mediation of Saudia Arabia,
revealed by Observer few days back. In this regard, there is recent statement by poppet
president Karzai just yesterday that Mullah Omer is his brother and he should come back
to Kabul and talk to us.

Pressure on Pakistan is being put to just make it an escape goat by shifting the gravity of
war from Afghanistan to Pakistan 's tribal areas by making more drone strikes so that tribesmen
would get provoke to fight against Pakistan Army with help of Taliban and Al-Qaeda. To make
this happen at faster speed, state of the art weaponary and communication system is being
provided to the militants in FATA and Balouchistan by India under the nose of US.

Re: Obama’s Risky Pakistan Strategy

Moin Ansari — Fri, 03 Oct 2008 13:50:31 -0000

A well written article, good analysis with a few exceptions.

>>Yet Pakistani military activity against Al Qaeda on its soil has been paltry.

This statement is not accurate. Pakistan has lost more than 4000 of its soldiers. 30,000 Tribals have been killed, and more than 300,000 tribals have been left homeless. Gitmo is full of people captures and deported from Pakistan. The destruction and damage to the Pakistani economy and the Pakistani psyche is so colossal that it runs into at least a Trillion Dollars. The loss calculated by the US DOD right after 911 was $20 per annum.

To the contrary, US Aid to Pakistan has been paltry. The US has refused to provide Pakistan, and most specifically the Frontier Constabulary and the Frontier corps with Predator drones, 100,000 M-16s, Armored Vehicles, satellites, choppers, night vision glasses, boots, uniforms, helmets, IED detection devices, bomb sniffing contraptions, bullet proof vests, or even jeeps to traverse the rugged terrain.

The US Aid given to Pakistan even if compared to Afghanistan's $15 Billion in the first five years and $40 Billion pledged now --is pennies on the Dollar. US Aid is wasted. Half of it is spent in the US, another 25% is wasted on US Embassy favored NGO administration and logistics. In the best of circumstances, 25% of US Aid has the potential to reach the victims. Most of that is lost to the corruption of US and Pakistani officials.

The US has lost the war in Afghanistan. Blaming Pakistan is not only an admission of defeat, it reminds the world of the blame on Cambodia, and Laos after the defeat in Vietnam was written on the wall.

Most of the US strikes have been on wrong targets. The wink wink nod, nod strategy continues to produce victims in Pakistan--where the extremists find willing volunteers. It not just having permission to bomb that matters--the collateral damage is blood and gore which when spilt causes problems for the world. U.S. attacks on Pakistan counterproductive: US Think tanks: (http://rupeenews.com/2008/1... US hubris of not appreciating the sacrifices of Pakistan, and deprecating the value of the help creates unnecessary anti-Americanism which causes terror not only for Pakistan but also around the world.

Editor Rupee News
http://www.rupeenews.com