<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>The Washington Independent - Latest Comments in Return of the $32,000 Tax Increase Claim</title><link>http://washingtonindependent.disqus.com/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Oct 2008 15:43:01 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Return of the $32,000 Tax Increase Claim</title><link>http://www.washingtonindependent.com.php5-9.websitetestlink.com/396/return-of-the-32000-tax-increase-claim#comment-3280885</link><description>Three weeks or three years, who cares!? I thought that Obama was promising tax cuts to everyone under $250,000 per year. Now we are facing a tax increase at $83,000???? Wow! That has got to impact millions of middle class working people. Are we now considered rich if a married couple is making $83K per year. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Word needs to get out about this. Is Obama pulling a bait and switch on us working middle classers that he has lured into the fold?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Johnny</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 24 Oct 2008 15:43:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Return of the $32,000 Tax Increase Claim</title><link>http://www.washingtonindependent.com.php5-9.websitetestlink.com/396/return-of-the-32000-tax-increase-claim#comment-2589084</link><description>Nitpicking details fails to give us a clue that his definition of  "Rich" is anywhere near the $250,000 he claims.  This analysis only confirms the fact - - doe not refute the sense of it.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Marv Chastain</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2008 22:49:13 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>