<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>The Washington Independent - Latest Comments in Petraeus vs. Webb</title><link>http://washingtonindependent.disqus.com/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 11:01:11 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Petraeus vs. Webb</title><link>http://www.washingtonindependent.com.php5-9.websitetestlink.com/1270/petraeus-vs-webb#comment-1789777</link><description>Jim Webb would, on a short leash, be an excellent Vice President to Barack Obama.    He's a fearsome patriot of American virtues and values.    His credibility impeccable, his courage unquestioned.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;He would be a reassuring presence for anyone who has questions about Barack's lack of national security experience.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;But Senator Webb, you'll have to leave the guns to the Secret Service.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">mikemidcity</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 11:01:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Petraeus vs. Webb</title><link>http://www.washingtonindependent.com.php5-9.websitetestlink.com/1270/petraeus-vs-webb#comment-1789778</link><description>&lt;i&gt;Would you agree, historically, that one of the realities we have to deal with is some sort Iranian influence in the region?&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Webb is great. That a state shouldn't influence the affairs of a border state under hated occupation is idiocy.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ronindc</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 10:00:37 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>