<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>The Washington Independent - Latest Comments in Pawlenty Sees No Fraud in Minnesota Recount</title><link>http://washingtonindependent.disqus.com/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 16:54:24 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Pawlenty Sees No Fraud in Minnesota Recount</title><link>http://washingtonindependent.com/18840/pawlenty-sees-no-fraud-in-minnesota-recount#comment-3867521</link><description>There was no evidence of voter fraud with ACORN either, jackass. There was voter REGISTRATION fraud that ACORN itself reported in accordance with the law and never resulted in voter fraud.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">esblofeld</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 16:54:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Pawlenty Sees No Fraud in Minnesota Recount</title><link>http://washingtonindependent.com/18840/pawlenty-sees-no-fraud-in-minnesota-recount#comment-3867317</link><description>how funny. When ACORN was the issue, actual evidence of fraud was irrelevant.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">jenkins</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 16:40:01 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>