-
Website
http://washingtonindependent.com/ -
Original page
http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=13980 -
Subscribe
All Comments -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
nbc1
409 comments · 2 points
-
naturalizedcitizen
1490 comments · 36 points
-
jjfitz
349 comments · 18 points
-
24AheadDotCom
363 comments · 28 points
-
Anteni
600 comments · 35 points
-
-
Popular Threads
-
Why I Don’t Write About Sarah Palin’s Facebook Posts
6 hours ago · 70 comments
-
Covering Palin the Right Way
5 hours ago · 11 comments
-
Tea Partiers on Griffith: ‘We Do Not Trust Him’
2 hours ago · 7 comments
-
Sean Hannity Winks at the Birthers
2 weeks ago · 934 comments
-
Pawlenty: Palin’s More Qualified Than Obama
2 days ago · 97 comments
-
Why I Don’t Write About Sarah Palin’s Facebook Posts
It is very clear in the Constitution. Cheney is muddying the waters for his own gain. When he served under the first Bush, he made it clear to Dan Quayle what he thought of the vice presidency. But, nooooo, when he gets the office himself, all of a sudden the Constitution can be seen very differently(!)
Read a text version here:
http://frwebgate.access.gpo.gov/cgi-bin/getdoc....
Voyant:
http://www.planwithvoyant.com
I am loving this tool. I created a better plan than my financial planner gave me. I fired him. I’m done with paper financial plans.
I am hugely anti-Palin but my fellows on the left bungled this criticism.
Jarhead -- read the Constitution.
US Constitution | Article 1 | Section 3:The Vice President of the United States shall be President of the Senate, but shall have no vote, unless they be equally divided.
The Senate shall choose their other officers, and also a President pro tempore, in the absence of the Vice President, or when he shall exercise the office of President of the United States.