<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>The Washington Independent - Latest Comments in Meet The Latest Soon-To-Be-Disproved Prediction</title><link>http://washingtonindependent.disqus.com/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2008 06:02:31 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Meet The Latest Soon-To-Be-Disproved Prediction</title><link>http://www.washingtonindependent.com.php5-9.websitetestlink.com/635/meet-the-latest-soon-to-be-disproved-prediction#comment-1790558</link><description>&lt;i&gt;Does Barack Obama make Dubik his Petraeus -- trotting him out to say "The general said we can turn it over to the Iraqis in a year; I say we trust the general"?&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Exactly. Many fellow dirty hippies have passed off the recent related Obama statement as old news or obvious. But the leading emphasis on relying on general feedback rather than on the withdrawal itself is ominous. As your allusion describes, just because it's Obama making the argument rather than Bush won't necessarily make the outcome different. Sometimes you just have to read the argument on its face.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ronindc</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2008 06:02:31 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>