<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>The Washington Independent - Latest Comments in GI Bill Progress Snagged</title><link>http://washingtonindependent.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://washingtonindependent.disqus.com/gi_bill_progress_snagged/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 09:05:27 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: GI Bill Progress Snagged</title><link>http://washingtonindependent.com/1395/gi-bill-progress-snagged#comment-1789545</link><description>&lt;p&gt;"...a 10-year pricetag of $51.8 billion." I guess a year, or less, of funding the occupation, and the attendant contracts, trumps all that nonsense about "supporting the troops." I wonder how many flag lapel pins that kind of cash would buy?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">strangely_enough</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 09:05:27 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>