-
Website
http://washingtonindependent.com/ -
Original page
http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=15817 -
Subscribe
All Comments -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
nbc1
409 comments · 2 points
-
RedGraham
360 comments · 6 points
-
naturalizedcitizen
519 comments · 12 points
-
jjfitz
336 comments · 18 points
-
24AheadDotCom
327 comments · 27 points
-
-
Popular Threads
-
Orly Taitz Smacked Down: Birther Lawsuit Dismissed
1 week ago · 2070 comments
-
Four Weeks Later, Senate Unanimously Passes Bill Extending Unemployment Benefits
3 days ago · 227 comments
-
House Passes Extended Unemployment Benefits
2 days ago · 106 comments
-
Unemployment Tops 10 Percent
1 day ago · 47 comments
-
Possible GOP Candidate: Ft. Hood Shootings Prove ‘The Enemy Is Infiltrating Our Military’
1 day ago · 29 comments
-
Orly Taitz Smacked Down: Birther Lawsuit Dismissed
That's one way to put it.
My question: lets say the (hacked) totals from a single polling place come to a negative number for Obama. Say negative 10,000 votes for Obama in polling place X. Let's say Obama receives 1,000,000 votes from the rest of the polling places in that state. Does he suddenly have 990,000 votes because of the negative ten thousand from the one location? Or is the negative number ignored? In 2004 in Ohio, I recall that there were negative totals from some locations and I'm not sure how the negative numbers were handled. There will have to be a court ruling on this someday. Otherwise, one polling location could reverse any election.