DISQUS

The Washington Independent: Dianne Feinstein Not Too Pleased With Panetta Pick

  • GTFOOH · 11 months ago
    Republicans have the nerve to suggest he is short on experience? Where were they when Bush put in that idiot Porter Goss as CIA head?
  • CranialRectalLoopback · 11 months ago
    Porter Gosling declared himself unfit to run the CIA before he was selected to run the CIA. Feinstein didn't seem to have a problem with that.

    Drown out Feinstein in 2010.
  • GTFOOH · 11 months ago
    I completely agree. Feinstein as head of the intelligence committee will be just like Jane Harmon was as head of the intelligence committee in the house. Another centerist San Francisco billionaire masquerading as liberal, who will roll over everytime a Republican snaps his fingers!
  • civitas · 11 months ago
    Actually it's Feinstein saying that Panetta is short on experience.
  • AlphaLiberal · 11 months ago
    Good point! And wasn't Porter Goss involved in some type of corruption?
  • skyeapril · 11 months ago
    Having Senators Feinstein and Rockefeller unhappy with the nomination of Leon Panetta makes me smile, a big smile. Dianne Feinstein and Jay Rockefeller have acted like spoiled children during the FISA and telecom immunity vote and my emails of frustration were answered, but with an attitude that they know what is best for us (the uninformed). My impression is that they believe they know things that we don't and we must just trust them. Well, I for one am tired of that attitude. The secrecy that Congress has allowed the Bush admin to keep has bred nothing but distrust by citizens. So, if Feinstein and Rockefeller are upset by this choice I think it must be a better one than I suspected.
  • civitas · 11 months ago
    Well, Feinstein and Rockefeller likely DO know things that you don't. Being Senators and all. Why on earth would you think they DON'T know more than you do? They have access to a lot of information that you don't and never will, have access to.

    The CIA is not going to begin publishing all of its information even under President Barack. By nature, it's a secretive organization. And Panetta won't change much at the CIA either. How would you like to be the CIA director who comes in making huge changes and then there's an attack on the US? It's hard to argue with 7 years of success.
  • skyeapril · 11 months ago
    Give me a break. 7 years of LUCK is more like it. Obviously you have been drinking the kool-aid for the past eight years..
  • civitas · 11 months ago
    Do you not understand that any administration following 7 years without an attack will be seen as a failure if there's another attack? Particularly if big changes are made to intelligence gathering. Seriously, you do not get that?
  • Mister Wu · 11 months ago
    I think this is a turff thing, not like they were going to auction of the position. Leon Panetta knows thing too not obvious on his resume. He's the Montery homeboy with lots of friends. (see http://www.monterey.org/langcap/ ) Perhaps now we'll get more foreign language speakers and less high tech toys in play in the CIA.
  • AlphaLiberal · 11 months ago
    Very good point. Feinstein has been making excuses for Bush and the Republicans for years. She has been very bad at oversight and has been silent while all manner of abuses, including torture, have occurred.

    I used to like her, but she has covered for the Republicans so many times I've just had it with her.
  • TBOSE · 11 months ago
    Sorry Ms Feinstein and Rocky made premature statements about Panetta. He will have a good team around him, and he will do a great job. To keep high officials with power out of the Military is good in Democracy, and Obama will be the ultimate authority. MS Feinstein would not have been anything without her husbands riches. It is shameful she supported the war, where a lot of money was made, and a lot of our young men perished nnecessarily. This woman should step down before showing more of her ignorance and arrogance.
  • gail wilhelm · 11 months ago
    Yah, and Fienstein supported Mulkasy for AG. I just don't trust her judgement on appoinments.
  • Vicki · 11 months ago
    Exactly! That' judgement of hers has been a killer as of late
  • John Zeller · 11 months ago
    This is the woman who helped push through Mukasey when he wouldn't come out against waterboarding.
  • Richard H. Davis · 11 months ago
    They should just tell Feinstien that Panetta is a a Republican (he once was) and she will vote to confirm.
  • cinnamonape · 11 months ago
    Well I assume that DiFi voted FOR the confirmation of these Sterling CIA Directors.

    George J. Tenet July 11, 1997–July 11, 2004
    Porter J. Goss September 24, 2004–April 21, 2005

    Maybe she has in mind someone like Dusty Foggo or David Addington?
  • gilmanc · 11 months ago
    I trust Dianne Feinstein's ability to determine who should be in what job about as far as I can throw AG Mukasey.
  • Jack · 11 months ago
    The president-elect didn't want Ms. Feinstein's opinion or he'd have asked for it.

    He's not 'asking' that Leon Panetta be confirmed, he's 'demanding' it in a very forceful way.

    She'll probably have to return any money she was paid by someone in the CIA who she already promised the job to. How embarrassing.
  • Huggles · 11 months ago
    Or maybe she has the interests of the US at heart?
  • Knowitall · 11 months ago
    She just wants to look relevant. Would her pick be truly clean and ethical? She allowed Cheney/Bush to carry on...
  • obsessed · 11 months ago
    "Or maybe she has the interests of the US at heart?"

    ...or maybe monkeys fly out my butt

    Are you kidding? Diane Feinstein is a socially liberal Republican who runs as a Democrat because she's from CA. She's married to a heavyweight defense contractor and has MANY conflicts of interest around this issue. She also, along with her partner in crime, Chuck Schumer, pushed through Mukasey, Alito, Roberts, torture, illegal wiretapping and every other abuse of the constitution under Bush. She makes Lieberman seem like a straight-shooter and she needs a major league primary challenger in 2012 to put her pathetic, dishonest career out of its misery once and for all.
  • Leo · 11 months ago
    What the CIA needs is a competent administrator who respects US laws and the constitution. All of the 'intelligence' 'experts' currently available either failed to prevent 9/11 or were heavily involved in torture and blooding the constitution

    Senator Feinstein is the same person who chose to confirm Mukasey as Attorney General even though he has stated that the president is above the law and that waterboarding is not torture. She has no credibility
  • Lee5 · 11 months ago
    Yes, Senator, unlike you, Mr. Panetta has remained against torture/waterboarding.

    Perhaps that is your disagreement with the gentleman's appt.
  • Carly Corday · 11 months ago
    The Countess Dianne Feinstein of California, a Peer of the Realm of the Kingdom of America, is LIVID! She had a candidate already selected for this post at Court: old, beloved favorite of The Ton, Sir Michael B. Mukasey!

    Look for Madame Feinstein to order that some heads should roll after this outrage. Or look for a DIFFERENT candidate be selected, one of HER choosing, in keeping with tradition! Otherwise, look for her Ladyship to be defended by that dashing cavalier, Lord Charles Schumer, who will draw his rapier and add his vote, making it "unanimous or else!'

    (wink) Gotta love our Ruling Class, their temperamental hissy fits, their brutal dictates, and how weird they act when the Left Hand of Power dares neglect to follow The Plan as laid out by the Right (Upper) Hand! WOW, is she smoked! This stuff is not supposed to be reported to the public. Get it back in gear, nobles! The public might find itself distracted from "TV Reality" if y'all get lazy. And that would be BAD....
  • Spencer · 11 months ago
    LOLZ.
  • c. chapman · 11 months ago
    yea, Princess Di is worried perhaps that some of hubby Richard Blum's business dealings (w/ Kissinger and China connections) could end up chop chop-----and, rightly so.-----She is a wash-up anyway----we won't even talk about Boxer; I am a liberal, Ca. Dem.--- (FEmale)---these 2 grand-dames have been around tooooooo long; we need some NEW, YOUNGER WOMEN------- and some w/o Richard Blum's investment connections------ummmmmmm
  • buddhistMonkey · 11 months ago
    I'm also a liberal California Democrat, and I like Barbara Boxer. No complaints at all. She voted against the Iraq War, and against Condoleezza Rice for Secretary of State. For my money, those votes bought her a lifetime appointment to the Senate, if she wants it.
  • c. chapman · 11 months ago
    alas, she seems to "hire" folks w/ criminal "issues"----ck. her staffing history------various gun-running, child porno.-----some years ago, some recent; wish she wasn't such an airhead; just cuz someone votes the way we like on certain issues (this is nice, of course, does not make them competent or cool---
    t
  • Bill · 11 months ago
    Lets keep Panetta and get rid of feinstein and her defense Contractor Husband. Maybe they could die in a plane crash ala Republican official?
  • Bill's Little Dick · 11 months ago
    No, asshole, maybe you should.
  • tswann · 11 months ago
    It is clear that she is part of the establishment (big money and absolute power) and Panetta is not. Why, he might even turn the page on torture! Wouldn't that be a disaster! (Not.)
  • David Black er · 11 months ago
    Cleraly, this appointment (Panetta) as head of CIA politicises our Contries Intellegence Community - shame on Oboma for playing polictics with the protection of our country
  • Helenahandbasket · 11 months ago
    "Cleraly"? Don't you mean "Clearly".? "Contries"? Don't you mean "Country's"? "Politicises"? Don't you mean "Politicizes"? "Oboma"? Don't you mean "Obama"? "Polictics"? Don't you mean "Politics".


    I mean, seriously, are all you Rushpublicans as dumb as a pocketful of rocks?
  • Paul · 11 months ago
    Learn to spell then you can try and not make a fool of yourself
  • E. D. · 11 months ago
    Uninformed comment
  • colin · 11 months ago
    What did you stop learning in the 5th grade? This is the most uneducated drivel I've seen on this site.
  • Christopher Flynn · 11 months ago
    "Not an auspicious sign for Panetta’s confirmation hearings..," but what a great choice to bring credibility back to the CIA. Shut-up feinstein, and run for governor, your time as a senator is waning...
  • Vicki · 11 months ago
    No Way!
    I don't want her as my Gov either!
  • vcarter64 · 11 months ago
    She needs to get a life and remeber we only have one president.. She can run for office in 2012 and lets see how many votes she get. Give me a break you can please everyone keep going Obama....
  • Karl · 11 months ago
    Democrats waste too much time & energy picking on each other
  • Common Sense · 11 months ago
    Wrong! It's called keeping our representatives ACCOUNTABLE! Something Republicans have no grasp of. Otherwise, Papa Bush wouldn't be pimping his son Jeb for Pres after the disaster that is George Bush. You screw up, you get the boot.
  • eztempo · 11 months ago
    I suspect that having Panetta in charge will challenge DiFi's unquestioning deference to "the Professionals" at CIA -- oh, lord! She's going to have to have an idea in her head and develop some independent 'oversight' skills, woe, the humanity!
  • feckless · 11 months ago
    When you address Senator Feinstein in french her performance in protecting our constitution sounds much more atractive:

    Collaborateur!
  • john · 11 months ago
    So . . . she's going to what . . . stomp her feet and hold her breath? And this from another clownish senator who can't interpret intelligence reports and thought Iraq had WMDs. Florida should bring retired Senator Bob Graham back to represent that state and run this committee.

    Intelligence "professionals" got us into these messes. We need someone who didn't think the Soviet soldiers were ten feet tall, that Iraqi soldiers were very tough and battle hardened, that Iraq didn't have WMDs, that we have precious little to fear from Iran, who thought that Afghanistan and Iraq were occupation quagmires waiting to occur.
  • Shawn · 11 months ago
    She was all for domestic spying...surprised she didn't hear anything about this.
  • mommadona · 11 months ago
    Ms Feinstein has been in bed with the neocons for years.
    DINO is scared to death - Panetta knows where the bones are buried.

    Her and Rambo Harman are sweating bullets.

    No more "business as usual", girls.
  • marley h · 11 months ago
    Diane Feinstein needs to get over herself. After 8 years of Bush, do they really want to cause inhouse fighting? What a whiner
  • newaukumlady · 11 months ago
    Panetta is exactly what the agency needs... he can learn intelligence; he cannot learn honor or respect for the the Constitution, which has been sorely lacking.
  • Brian T. Ferguson · 11 months ago
    Panetta is old hack and Senator Feinstein is absolutely correct to disagree. She is one of the very few who actually responded to me when I was repeatedly kidnapped (literally) by the Bush administration. The FBI did nothing to counteract the CIA drug running done in New York Pennsylvania, Ohio, North Carolina, Texas, Florida and elsewhere. As one who's ex-girlfriend's brother who knew Cheney, Santorum and the rest of the Abramoff crowd, I can attest that the treatment I suffered simply for knowing too much about the cover-ups in Washington lead me to believe that there are far too many of the old school politicians still playing the fields. All should remember that Panetta goes way back to the Reagan days of Iran Contra and some of those people continued on with the money laundering by the CIA and to which spilled over to the Keating Five. Panetta is associated with Anthony Lake, Steve Lake illegally held me captive and the cover-up is just sickening.
  • Barbara in Palm Springs · 11 months ago
    Given the performance of the intelligence agencies...the in-fighting, "hiding" info from each other, torture, etc....under the "management" of "professionals"....give a real "manager" a chance to clean up the mess, get rid of the "red tape" and redundant functions....so, I think Panetta can do it.

    Dianne, time to retire!!
  • mike · 11 months ago
    Did she get upset when GHW Bush ws heada of the CIA? I don't believe he had any intelligence background, either. Not to be confused by his son, who had no intelligence, period.
  • Lanny R. North · 11 months ago
    Panetta was chief of staff for years in the White House, had 16 years experience in CALIFORNIA and is a familiar figure even to myself, so how come Feinstein seems to be shocked and dismayed?? Is she professing complete ignorance about a person from her own state and who served as chief of staff?
    OR is she but the tip of the iceberg of MY party's extreme left that has long ago forgotten everything about real governance? I would remind her that we who have elected President Obama trust in his judgement and perception of need infinitely more than those who continue to carry about shop worn notions from the distant past. If Senator Feinstein wishes to rationally evaluate and support her reasons for opposing the choice of President Obama, then I suggest she come up with a better supporting arguement than her own pretense of ignorance.
  • Jean · 11 months ago
    She may be upset that given her position she should have been consulted first, or at least told before publication as a courtesy. If such really is Washington protocol, Diane can forget it for a while. Obama's whole Chicago crew is arrogant.
  • Barbara in Palm Springs · 11 months ago
    Don't confuse intelligence and competence with arrogance...the reason we are in the mess we are in is due to the ARROGANCE of Bush and his cronies

    Check the dictionary!!
  • spero · 11 months ago
    If such is really Washington protocol, and Obama's crew chose to ignore it, then Hallelujah, and let us rejoice - celebrate the D-Slap!

    That would be the very best news since for-f-ing-evah. It can't possibly be true.
  • Rachel · 11 months ago
    Um, Feinstein on the "extreme left"? Thanks for the laugh.
  • R. Blanc · 11 months ago
    Extreme left?
    I'd like a little of what you've been smoking.
  • spero · 11 months ago
    Left? Lanny, where on earth have you been? Or - would that be "North" as in: "Oliver?"
  • alfo · 11 months ago
    DIANE GO SIT DOWN,THEY .THE INTELLIGENCE PROFESSIONALS R THE ONES WHO HAVE FU@#@ THIS UP.
  • spero · 11 months ago
    I believe the best of the intelligence "professionals" fled when cheney's gereb, porter goss, clanked in to the agency.

    the rest seem to have bent their very effective efforts toward getting rid of chalabi and goss and who knows who else?
  • RAL371 · 11 months ago
    Panetta was one of the most biased Hillaryite that in most of the talking head discourses refused to accept anything positive about Obama. TOTALLY POOR CHICE. Just a Hillary flack.!
  • obsessed · 11 months ago
    I have no idea whether Panetta is a good pick but I'm for anything that DiFi's against. She, Reid, Hoyer and Schumer are all toxic pond scum who do everything in their power to keep the corrupt infrastructure intact.
  • Jim C · 11 months ago
    You forgot Pelosi .
  • AJS · 11 months ago
    In what skewed mind is Feinstein of the EXTREME LEFT?

    Nice try Lanny, Maybe you prefer a "liberal" Like Zell Miller?
  • Howard E. · 11 months ago
    Sen. Feinstein, as part of the Intelligence community, bears some responsibility for the abuses of the past 8 years. If she's unhappy with Panetta, then I'm pleased with the choice. Methinks that she is more peeved that she wasn't consulted first.
  • shawn · 11 months ago
    Please Diane shut up. You sat on your butt for years and gave Bush everything and never spoke the hell up. You let Muskey in and approved him. Diane get over yourself. We let you sit on the intelligence committee and you just went along with anything bush wanted. My suggestiion to you is maybe it is time for you to leave. Tired of the old way of thinking. You just wanted to put someone you were buddy buddy with in this position. We need new blood and Leon is new blood compared to you.
  • Al, California · 11 months ago
    I don't trust Dianne Feistein. She was not against war in Iraq from the beginning, and she are too political, too much rotating along political winds. Boxer is far better. I have infinitely higher confidence in Obama judgment than in Feistein opinion.
  • dofus · 11 months ago
    DiFi- tip of Iceberg of the extreme Left???

    That can only mean that Lenny is a Republican.
  • HeavyHitter · 11 months ago
    After putting her stamp of approval on Mukasey, Feinstein ought to shut up and let the grownups control things from here on in.
  • Dave Beemon · 11 months ago
    Nobody cares what she thinks. She tanked it for Bush/Chaney, thinking there was some kind of reward at the end of the rainbow of greed, graft, murder, and corruption. She is the basic political whore of Washington, not having the guts to slap her pimp, the lobbyists.
  • Eric Valinsky · 11 months ago
    Diane Feinstein is a Lieberman-like stealth conservative and should keep her mouth shut. At this point, I agree with "obsessed" that if Feinstein is agin it, I'm fer it.
  • Deanna · 11 months ago
    Too bad it's not her decision to make. All we ever get from this tired old war horse is negative.
    Perhaps it's time to put the old nag out to pasture.
  • Bgb · 11 months ago
    vcarter64, fyi, Obama is not a dictator and people are allowed to disagree with him.
  • Kent Dobbs · 11 months ago
    This is more of the same (crap) from Senator Feinstein.
    This war profiteer ought to be sent packing, NOW!
  • pointus · 11 months ago
    Anything that DiFi is against, I am for. I detest the likes of her, Reid, Pelosi and Hoyer more than words can say... much more even than the Republicans.
  • jimbo · 11 months ago
    who cares what the DEVILWOMAN thinks.........hopefully shes about as useless in this admin as she was in the last. haha, when will california get rid of this person?? cindy, will you run against her next cylce??? PLEEEEEASE!!
  • mike · 11 months ago
    Anybody really care what Feinstein thinks? We're supposed to be upset because Obama didn't clear it with her?
  • Rachel · 11 months ago
    What a useless seat-warmer. She never lifted a finger against the Bush Administration. Her mewlings here are equally irrelevant.
  • Majic · 11 months ago
    Diane Feinsein is one of the most corrupt and evil politicians of the past 30 plus years. She supported Bush whenever she thought no one was looking, like the Medicare prescription debacle that see voted for saying "It is better than nothing" wrong nothing would have been better. She opposed Prop. 5 in November to support the Republican Fat Cats that run California prisons. She is as bad as Blago in Illinois and that kind of fat cat corruption has got to stop. She has been rotten since the 60s and that has never changed. Off with their heads and out of government please.
  • Rachel · 11 months ago
    Don't forget the bankruptcy bill!
  • James VanCise · 11 months ago
    Damn straight !!!!
  • spero · 11 months ago
    Third!
  • David · 11 months ago
    Maybe Feinstein is NOT moving up in the Intel committee, and aren't we tired of her and her husband benefitting financially from her job?
  • John Hay · 11 months ago
    Regardless of Senator Feinstein's hurt ego and premature opinion, President elect Obama has the right to nominate his selection for this office. QED. Any comment by Feinstein at this juncture is ill timed and calls into question her true motivation.
    John Hay
    Australia
    www.tellingthoughts.com
  • Diana w · 11 months ago
    Dianne Feinstein is a hack. She supported the Mukasey confirmation among other things. She is a wolf in sheep's clothing. They should stuff her. Look at her record. Inconsistent at best with basic Democratic principles
  • elRey · 11 months ago
    Ha-Ha Diane!!! Are you afraid that your covering up for Bush's illegal spying is going to be exposed! Tough!
  • Mary · 11 months ago
    She is only looking out for her husband's business deals. She cares more about her pocket book than she cares about America.
  • KLG · 11 months ago
    Hey, DiFi: Bite me! And I mean that in all seriousness.
  • Billclock · 11 months ago
    God, can't they give Obama a chance! Leon Panetta may be the most fair-minded politician Washington has seen in 100 years.
    What with the Burris problem and the Kennedy problem, and the Richardson problem and the Franken problem, this shiny new administration can't get a break--and they deserve one--as does the country.
  • L. Williams · 11 months ago
    Screw you, Feinstein, you cowardly old whore.
  • impeachbushanyoldtimenow · 11 months ago
    No they are way dumber than rocks. Try a pocketfull of Rush's pills.
  • Marsha Epstein · 11 months ago
    I gave up on Feinstein when she supported Condi Rice for Secretary of State. What a hack!
  • Pinko Punko · 11 months ago
    I will be on the phone with her office tomorrow. Hammering away.
  • R. Blanc · 11 months ago
    I'm glad Obama picked someone from outside the agency. He is in no way associated with the torture regime, which is a critical criteria.
    Feinstein doesn't like it? I wonder why. Could she be worried about her own culpability in the whole sordid chapter in American history?
    I have a message for Feinstein; just shut up.
  • mike munk · 11 months ago
    Good news that Obama ignored her! Feinstein, together with Chuck Schumer are responsible for confirming Mukasy at AG, and she is reported to have approved torture as one of the gang of eight briefed on that and rendition.
  • Chris · 11 months ago
    The good senator has always been somewhat flawed as a representative of even midstream Democrat principles. We could never depend on her with laws, selection of supreme court judges, or any issue that we felt threatened our basic constitutional rights. Hopefully, she'll be returning to Califronia soon.
  • burro · 11 months ago
    This Bay Area liberal would like to take this opportunity to once again tell Diane Feinstein to go Cheney herself. What DiFi thinks is not important and she should be ignored with extreme prejudice. "Intelligence professionals" have done a pretty crappy job of running our intelligence interests. We have been lied to by "intelligence professionals". DiFi's allegiance to "intelligence professionals" says more about her sneaky, underhanded motives than about Leon Panetta's appropriateness for the job.

    It's a drag that we are stuck with her for awhile but we don't have to pay any attention to her. And Mukasey is her guy. Nuff said.
  • jfxgillis · 11 months ago
    Spencer:

    To the contrary, this is VERY auspicious! It means the "serious" people in the Beltway are dismayed, and that's a most excellent thing.
  • Barbara · 11 months ago
    Good for Pres-elect Obama. I hope he ignores her and her ilk . I'm a Democrat but with Democrats like Finestein, we're going to get the same old results we got in the last eight years, esp. of illegal Bush administration acts and U.S.-Israel policies.
  • GTFOOH · 11 months ago
    Di, nobody cares what you think. You've been telling everybody in earshot that you are leaving the Senate to run for Governor anyway. Go ahead and get the hell out!
  • Singularity · 11 months ago
    Sounds like somebody needs a primary challenger.
  • Ben · 11 months ago
    DiFi's opposition is, as many have already said, a great argument in Panetta's favor.
  • Harry · 11 months ago
    WAAA. You didn't pick the person I wanted.
  • Scooter P · 11 months ago
    Her time is past. Get her and Harry Reid a nice pasture for dino's and real thinking progressives in .
    Could she have the pro Israel team she wants at CIA and not want it disrupted? I believe Israel has the right to peacefully exist...within it's original borders. Enough of supporting their expansionism under the guise of security...
  • DINO-sore · 11 months ago
    That great turd, Diane Feinstein, needs to retire. She is a better Republican than most party hard-liners and as the head of Intelligence, will continue to work tirelessly to strip Americans of every last vestige of privacy. She has been an integral partner to the Bush administration in it's grab for executive power and she cares less for the constitution than for her own place in history.

    Like many DINO's she will only be remembered for the damage she did to our country.
  • spero · 11 months ago
    Is Leon Panetta the Democratic analog of George Tenet? The "nice guy" sans Intelligence chops?

    Don't know, but Feinstein's opposition propels me toward the Panetta camp. It's also a pick that signals a real break with the cheney business.

    Feinstein should devote herself to acts of contrition, followed by massive expenditures focused on keeping her seat against a vigorous primary challenge.
  • E. L. MccCendon · 11 months ago
    Feinstein is a pain in the ass. She is very wealthy , through financial dealings by her husband that have a problem with the "smell test". She is totally "for Diane". If I were Obama I would ignore her at every possible turn. California has another weirdo leader in Pelosi, who has a similar financial background.
    I note these unhappy realities although I am solidly Democrat, and support womens' causes.
    E. L. McClendon
  • cjop · 11 months ago
    What! Now she's going to pretend to do her job. After how many years of rolling over for Bush. Give me a break. What the hell does she think she is? A senator? Christ!
  • Cubster · 11 months ago
    She thinks we need somebody who will go along with the FISA violations. You know the grownups know best. I think it is time that we had some real leadership at this post. I think Leon is a great pick. Maybe she thinks they should have picked one of her buds.
  • spero · 11 months ago
    A body of leads has been assembled which suggests that George Bush may have been associated with the CIA at some time before the autumn of 1963. According to Joseph McBride of The Nation, "a source with close connections to the intelligence community confirms that Bush started working for the agency in 1960 or 1961, using his oil business as a cover for clandestine activities." 1 By the time of the Kennedy assassination, we have an official FBI document which refers to "Mr. George Bush of the Central Intelligence Agency," and despite official disclaimers there is every reason to think that this is indeed the man in the White House today.
  • steve · 11 months ago
    I believe that George Bush Sr. was the more likely George Bush being discussed.
  • Joe · 11 months ago
    Every reason but one. In 1960 George W. Bush (the man in the White House today) was 14 years old. Perhaps you meant his father, former President George H.W. Bush, who was the Director of the CIA during the Ford administration.
  • Steve May · 11 months ago
    He'll get confirmed. She's just pissed Her Highness wasn't "consulted."

    Besides, Panetta has the only qualifications he needs . . . a former Clinton loyalist.

    Now we're beginning to see how Obama had to sell his soul to buy Clinton's "suspension" of her Campaign . . .
  • libdemannie · 11 months ago
    Hey Ms. Feinstein - SHUT UP.
  • News Review · 11 months ago
    Uhmm.. Panetta might be a good choice.. Thats exactly how Obama's transition works.. Pick someone not necessarily fit for the job.. It's worth a try..
  • Jim H · 11 months ago
    How do we replace Feinstein/
  • CranialRectalLoopback · 11 months ago
    Drown her out in 2010.
  • John · 11 months ago
    Perhaps Panetta is not good enough for Israel? Most of the Jewish members of congress seem to have their first allegiance to Israel - America comes second (Fleece as much you can).
  • RipVan · 11 months ago
    It appears OBAMA wants a new face in an agency where he needs someone he can trust.........
    can anyone trust the agency as it is operating now ?
    someone who's not tied to the way things have been done there. Someone who will tell

    the President what's going on and where the bodies are burried. ( including the bodies
    from the World Trade Center demolitions.) New faces in the CIA........ Kennedy tried this as well
    after the Bay of Pigs. My guess is that Leon won't be welcomed by many.
  • vince kent · 11 months ago
    Feinstein is absolutely right. Intelligence requires more than political connections and requires an intelligence professional.
  • CranialRectalLoopback · 11 months ago
    How would Feinstein know? She has no intelligence.
  • AlphaLiberal · 11 months ago
    Oh? So the CIA shold be left in the hands of the CIA?

    Don't the CIA answer to a civilian authority? Feinstein has not exercised oversight from the Senate. Someone has to take control of that place.

    Bush has politicized everything in government and I doubt that the CIA is any different.
  • steve · 11 months ago
    I presume this means that she wants someone who supports torture. I hope Obama has the balls to stay with this guy. It's one of his few picks with any teeth.
  • NonCompassionateLiberal · 11 months ago
    Right, at the tender age of 14 or 15, "boy genius" (and James Bond/007 official fan club member) George Bush started working for the CIA. But he was a good boy and was always home by his mom's 9:00 curfew. Either that, or it was his father (and later CIA director) George H.W. Bush (and not the one in the White House today). Either that, or your joking.
  • CranialRectalLoopback · 11 months ago
    She's PO'd because she supports torture. Drown out Feinstein in 2010.
  • ginny · 11 months ago
    Well,,,well...well...what have we here? Could Mr.Panetta be treading on some influential toes?
  • AlphaLiberal · 11 months ago
    Dianne Feinstein is an apologist for the worst abuses of the Bush Adminstration. She's part of the problem.

    Sorry, Dianne, it's time to open up the CIA to others to see what's going on there. You had your chance for a few years to conduct some oversight and you did a lousy job.
  • civitas · 11 months ago
    You don't seriously believe the CIA is going to be "opened up", do you? If you do, prepare to be seriously disappointed. Obama and Pantta, or whomever gets the job, will quietly continue the policies that have kept the US safe for 7 years. Neither will make big changes. Would you like to explain to the American public after an attack that the changes you made really didn't lead to another attack on the US?
  • AlphaLiberal · 11 months ago
    No, I typed that wrong. I meant opened up for someone else to see. We'll never know what's happened in the CIA.

    But I do disagree that they'll continue the same policies that have damaged our nation's standing and increased the threat of harm of extremism by pushing people to extremes.

    Obama will put a halt to torture and warrantless wiretapping which, BTW, are restrictions on freedom (and illegal and against our Constitution). Obama will restore freedoms damaged by Bush!

    I hope conservatives can be less fearful in 2009.
  • civitas · 11 months ago
    Who do you mean by "someone else"? The next CIA Director? Well, with every adminsitration change, the CIA is opened up for somneone else to see. There's nothing new in that.

    If you think that Obama will make big changes to Bush policy at the CIA, and trumpet those changes, then how do you think Obama will respond if there's an attack after 7 years without one? Will he say, "we made big changes at the CIA and this latest attack is just something we must accept"? How will the American public like that? Bush has left a 7 year record without another attack. Any administration following that record has to produce an equally good record or it will be seen as having failed.
  • Thebigkate · 11 months ago
    Let us be real about this! Dianne Feinstein is not happy because Leon Panetta is not an AIPAC shill! That is her interest, and she will not support anybody who is not aligned with AIPAC!!!
  • teresa · 11 months ago
    Hey Senator Feinstein, I have something to say to you:
    Get over it, you two supported the Bush Administration and their efforts to codify torture. As a nation we will never live it down, just like the Germans can't live down Hitler and Nazism. You two did nothing good for your country. You could have stood up and stood against techniques used in the Spanish Inquisitions, you did not. You two should keep your mouths shut, you had your chance and you blew it, and you took a nation down with you. I for one will not forgive you. You are complicit in Bush's greatest mistakes. Hopefully, you can live with yourselves, the problem is you probably can, but me, I can't. You let us down.
  • bobdevo · 11 months ago
    F**k Feinstein. This is the incompetent bitch who, along with Chuckie Schumer, gave us Mukasey as Attorney General, and who went along to get along with the Bush crime family's assault on the rule of law.
  • Monica · 11 months ago
    It seems that all the so called "intelligence professionals" have not done too well in the past say what 50 years, so maybe it is time for some real changes....
  • Shane · 11 months ago
    Are you serious?????? What planet do you live on? If you would take time and climb down from your redwood treefort, take a shower and shave your pits and take notice that this world is a very ugly place.....and yet our country is still standing....that should tell you our intelligence men and woman have been doing something right. You can't get it right 100% of the time....but sure as hell, they have tried.
  • stop thinking · 11 months ago
    You sound scared. In the end, you are going to die. We all are. 130 years from now not one of us alive today will be here. Accept the fact that you can die any minute and then you will be happier and not say such strange things.
  • mary a · 11 months ago
    Type your comment here. Ms Feinstein has had problems with President elect Obama since he won the primary against her candidate, Hillary Clinton. She seemed irritated that he didn't pick Hillary as VP. Then she was a no-show at the Democratic Convention using an ankle injury as the reason for her absence. I've lost a great deal of respect for her over the past year. She clearly has some issues she needs to deal with.
  • KQuark · 11 months ago
    Yeah the last three CIA chiefs had a boat load of experience.

    It got us.

    -The biggest ter ror attack on our soil.
    -An unjustified invasion of a sovereign nation, with no weapons of mass destruction.
    -A failed assessment of post invasion Iraq, remember we will be greeted as liberators.
    -North Korea with nuclear weapons.
    -We did not capture or ki ll Bin Laden.
    -And thanks to the tor tort uring CIA we have lost our standing around the world.

    With that type of experience I will take a CIA director with good judgment who saw the ter rorist with post invasion Iraq and a CIA director that does not want to tor ture.

    You people make me sick especially so called Obama supporters that want the same criminal and incompetent people who were in the CIA or enabled the massive failures of the CIA within the congress.
  • ron · 11 months ago
    Diane might have power but she'd better grow up. Obama is President, Not Feinstein.
  • PJWhite · 11 months ago
    Get over yourself, Dianne. Have you heard? Obama's going to change the way things are done in Washington. And that means YOU are not the President. Why don't you just go back to what you've done for the past 8 long years and rubber stamp every single thing the President does?
  • TBOSE · 11 months ago
    Hello MS Feinstien, Dont act like the president. We have only ONE at a time. Shut up and do not criticise our leader just to get a few pages in paper and on TV. What experience do you have to chair that committee?
    Go take a break and enjoy your old age.
  • FunMe · 11 months ago
    Another SKANK ... also known as a female DINO who should stop being an obstructionist in the Democratic party.

    Gosh, how I wish we Californian could kick her out of office NOW. She cares more about "power" and making more money for her and her husband's defense-related business.
  • jeebus · 11 months ago
    Die in a fire, Dianne.
  • Spencer · 11 months ago
    Can we not criticize people without wishing them a painful death?
  • Alina M. Lopez Marin · 11 months ago
    I supported Dianne Feinstein since she was mayor of San Francisco and in her first bid for the Senate till recently. I stopped supporting her because of her husband alleged unjust enrichment over the war in Iraq, her stand on FISA, her lack of support over the impeachment of Bush for high crimes and misdemeanors, etc. I considered her bad judgment over her support of Hillary Clinton an issue where reasonable people may differ. She is however at this point being obstinate about Panetta for what appears to be a political rivalry rather than real substance.

    Even if you assume that she may be correct in her assessment that a professional may be best suited for the job, she should give Obama the benefit of the doubt and express her displeasure privately and remind him that she expects the same courtesy in return. There is not any evidence to support that Panetta has ever done anything in violation of the US Constitution or International laws.
  • civitas · 11 months ago
    Has Feinstein actually accused Panetta of ever doing anything in violation of the US Constitution or International laws? If not, what's the point of evidence of him committing such acts?
  • Richard · 11 months ago
    Senator Feinstein is off the wall on this one. Sorry, gal, but who cares whether you got a briefing or not. Everyone she wants with "experience" is tainted by approving, tacitly or more openly, of the torture and Abu Garev nightmare that he has managed to avoid. He's a solid manager and not at all a left wing kook, so what's the problem?
  • bookishatx · 11 months ago
    Dianne Feinstein is worried about the implications of transparency, especially as regards her support for the torture enablers in the Bush White House. Time to pay the piper.
  • Frances Saykaly · 11 months ago
    Senator Feinstein: "....a professional ....", even if they have no problem with torture! What rock did you crawl out from under. Understand something: you are NOT the President! Get over it!!
  • John Sullivan · 11 months ago
    Dianne Feinstein will not approve anyone or anything that doesn't support her husband's business activities.
    The fact that Pinetta is Catholic doesn't help.
    Feinstein should under no conditions have a position in the Intellegence survice.

    John Sullivan
  • Pam · 11 months ago
    Ms Feinstein - I will communicate here, since now even though I am a California resident I have been blocked from your email - at least that's the message I get when I attempt to contact you.

    I really don't give smelly air wether you were consulted or not. You are not the President and for that matter much of a Senator. My question to you is why could not a professional call to the President Elect to inform him of your concerns rather than this media PMS fit??? You my dear are human just like the rest of us. And you are also this countries paid employee. Behave like a big girl and quit throwing your toys. Re-election already looks like a rough road for you. You will be skipping off into the sunset with the govenator if I had my choice....
  • harry mattachine · 11 months ago
    Dianne Emiel Goldman Berman Feinstein Blum -- received her B.A. degree in history in 1955...'nuff said?

    Potential 2010 Governor campaign [[her last anti-Democrat strategy]]: Feinstein is being reported as considering running for Governor of California when Republican Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger is term limited. Most of the state's top Democrats are eyeing the race, but Feinstein is such a well-known figure among California voters that her entry likely would push most other Democrats out of the race.[original research?] A private poll in July 2008 showed Feinstein far outpacing Jerry Brown, a former governor, 50 percent to 24 percent, with current Lieutenant Governor John Garamendi at 10 percent.[39]
  • IowaCampaigner · 11 months ago
    Feinstein-

    Please get over yourself and get to work. Make something positive happen for a change. I am a life-long Democrat who is thoroughly sick of the Business-as-Usual attitude of the Hill's old Crones like you and Barney Frank. Please, either lead, follow, or get out of the way, you incompetent geriatric bag of stale air! You have a brilliant, hard-working, popular, young President-elect who coincidentally is a Democrat. None of those adjectives apply to you. Couldn't you at least identify with the agenda of your own Party, the will of the People, and the crises at hand in this country, and do the right thing? It is definitely NOT ABOUT YOU, Feinstein.
  • fltnsplr · 11 months ago
    Feinstein is not the President, and therefore has nothing to say about this pick. Oh sure, she can make it difficult, but perhaps she should consider her reputation as a Bush-enabler and her husband's as a war profiteer before she opens her rather large mouth any further.

    What she wants is someone whose beliefs match hers, or someone she might be able to control. Obama and Panetta are neither. And it certainly wouldn't hurt the CIA to have a little objective oversight after eight years of bullshit from the spin machine.

    Panetta's a smart guy who doesn't owe many favors to anybody. Too bad for you, DiFi!

    Grammatical note: The agency would not be "best-served" in any case, because the hyphen in that construction is superfluous. One could, however, speak of a "best-served agency". Please, everybody, leave the unnecessary punctuation out of your writing. (And while you're at it, maybe you could stop abusing "out" by adding it after whatever verb is being used. Otherwise, I will have to correct out your English assignment.)

    Bottom line: Feinstein's personal jester is leaving the White House, and regardless of her assuming leadership of the Intelligence Committee, that influence hardly trumps that of the new boss. Suck eggs, baby!
  • fltnsplr · 11 months ago
    Civitas, I believe you're putting the cart before the horse. How about looking at it a little differently?
    Instead of trumpeting that there have been seven years without an attack, how about admitting that there was an attack not even a year into Bush's reign?

    By all accounts, the people in his administration received ample warning from Clinton's national security advisor; there had been numerous intercepts of terrorist communications; Bush went on vacation at a critical time; he handed over control of the military to Cheney (that dickhead) in May of 2001; at the time of the attack, most of the fighter squadrons in the Northeast were conducting an exercise which bore an eerie resemblance to what was actually happening, and they were doing so hundreds of miles from Washington.

    Either incompetence or collusion was involved, in my opinion. Obviously the intelligence services were doing their job, but Bush & Co. didn't give a plugged nickel for anything which might force them to get off their lazy asses or would diminish their fortunes. I think they were behind 9 - 11, and you may quote me on that.

    At any rate, let's not pretend that the narcissistic, ignorant mentality which has been fostered in Washington for the last eight years has been keeping us safe. Just ask any resident of New Orleans.
  • Dee J · 11 months ago
    Dianne... You did an excellent job of moderating the Presidents Inauguration Ceremony...
    However,
    Illegals are robbing us, new Pres. Obama's policies & staff, abortion (I'm pro life), schools, closing of Guantanamo and releasing of terrorists, middle class with new government making us SLAVE labor with horrindous double debts. spending & borrowing being done by our Government in Ca & USA.

    WE PUSHED FOR YOU...and believed in you... California government spending is way out of control. We see your struggle .... however, you seemed to fight more for us during your first term????

    NOW WE FACE WHAT WE FEARED WOULD HAPPEN WITH OBAMA... GOVERNMENT CONTROL & LOSS OF FREEDOM for the middle class who pays slave taxes for illegals.
    and... Ca is wanting a loan from the Government???
    .
    ***OUR TRILLIONS HAVE BEEN GIVEN OUT IRRESPONSIBLE TO BANKS AND ORGANIZITIONS WITHOUT A PLAN FOR RETURN OR INSPECTION ON THE INVESTMENTS??? WOULD YOU DO THIS WITH YOUR PERSONAL EARNINGS???
    now you have another trillion you are rushing without thought to bury us in without giving us a chance to vote on any of it.....

    HISTORY AND PRESENT DAY CHALLENGES....

    MY SONS ( bothe of them)LOST JOBS WITH THE FIRE DEPT. BECAUSE THEY WERE WHITE AND NOT MAJORITY TWENTY YEARS AGO....
    DO YOU WANT A WAR IN THE USA BECAUSE OF THE LOSS OF OUR RIGHTS??
    IT'S IN THE WINGS OBAMA FANS... OBAMA IS NOT A GOD, STOP TREATING HIM LIKE ONE AND WAKE UP...

    1. OIL reserve: WE'RE NOT HEARING ABOUT THE OIL DIGGING IN USA OR MAKING SURE WE HAVE THE COMPANIES HERE TO DO RESEARCH ON IT NOW SO WE ARE NOT SLAVES TO THE ARAB, RUSSIAN, ETC. OIL FIELDS...????


    2. Guantanamo.... NO INTERIGATION... NO JAILS .... KISSY, KISSY, BROWN NOSERS IN OUR SENATE AND CONGRESS...

    3. SAFETY..... Take away the fear of retribution and OUR ENEMIES WILL "CATCH US WITH OUR PANTS DOWN" AND AMERICA WILL BE NO MORE

    4. ABORTION... ALL OVER THE WORLD PAID BY AMERICANS.... GOD WILL BLOW US OUT OF THE WATER FOR WHOLESALE MURDER OF BABIES....

    5. THE MIDDLE CLASS HAS BEEN SLAVES TO "WET BACKS" and illegals for MANY, MANY YEARS. Our taxes have been the slavery for millions. The bible says "if you work not, you eat not". Instead we not only feed, house, hospitalize, school, prefer them to our own children, husbands and the woman does three jobs now to put food for her table. Or should we all go on welfare?

    I was in Jr College doing fine... happy and goal oriented when MY FAMILY HAD TO MOVE TO SO. CAL BECAUSE OF CHEAP LABOR IN THE FIELDS IN SALINAS, CA. I HAD TO QUIT JR COLLEGE BECAUSE I HAD NO PLACE TO LIVE OR A WAY TO PAY FOR IT BECAUSE WET BACKS CAME IN AND THEY CAME IN AND WORKED FOR LITTLE. AFTER THEY DID THIS THEN THEY DEMANDED UNION PAY AND NOW PAID DOUBLE. WE ARE THE SLAVES FOR MEXICAN ILLEGALS STATE & COUNTY AID, HELP FOR SCHOOL AND EDUCATION, CAR REPAIR, HEALTH CARE FREE WHILE I WAIT FOR HMO REFERRALS THAT COME WITH LESS THAN REPUTABLE DRs who put me on a waiting list for an appointment. WE ARE TIRED OF BEING SLAVES TO THE WELFARE SYSTEM...
    IF THE MOVIE STARS AND the "anything Obama says vote for it" SENATE and congress STOP SENDING THEIR MONEY TO OVERSEAS BANKERS AND INVESTMENTS AND START PAYING TAXES WE WOULD HAVE A DECENT EDUCATION SYSTEM, WALL STREET MAY SELL USA STOCK AND THE BANKS WOULD NOT BUY BANKS IN EUROPE WITH OUR MONEY.

    ENOUGH IS ENOUGH OBAMA contribute and supporters...GIVE YOUR OWN MONEY to your leaches who do not work and collect checks we pay for and MAY YOUR CABINET DO THE SAME.
    ACT LIKE IT'S YOUR ACCOUNT YOU'RE BORROWING FROM AND YOUR HOME OR CITY YOU ARE SENDING THESE WAR CRIMINALS TO. LET HILLARY AND FANNIE MAE AND THOSE WHO TOOK BRIBES OR PAYMENTS INSTEAD OF WORKING FOR US IN THE USA.

    BUSH... I, WE WANT YOU BACK.... WE ARE FEELING VERY UNSAFE WITH ALL THE THE CHANGES THAT ARE BEGINNING.

    GOD IS THE ONLY GOD.... OBAMA IS NOT... HE'S ONLY A MAN MADE OF FLESH AND so are HIS "brown nosing staff" ... newly weds who vote for everything he wants. Help! Sos!! Where are the truth seekers and finders we voted in?

    I am 73 yrs young... I put in 8-14 hours a day because my husband and I lost our home in the So. Cal. earth quake and had to start all over again rebuilding our savings even to buy a home.
    I DON'T mind work... I enjoy sharing and motivating people and seeing them change and go forward. I do have Hispanics (friends and associates that are winners & team supportive) in my companies down line who have expressed they do not want illegals here either who did not do what they did to be legal citizens. They love America and they want to achieve the American dream. They say, "What you do not pay for or work for you do not appreciate".

    WHAT DO WE DO AND DO IT QUICKLY TO SAVE OUR FREEDOM TO PREACH GODS WORD AS IT IS AND NOT MODIFY IT TO MEET HOMOSEXUAL SALVATION?
    FREEDOM ... NOT TO PAY FOR ILLEGALS??
    RIGHTS FOR THE BEST MAN OR WOMAN TO HAVE THE JOB.... NOT BECAUSE THEY ARE BLACK, MEXICAN OR ORIENTAL....

    My grandchildren are suffering for their education because they have children who do not speak English.
    We pay for lunches that I never got when I was growing up.
    TAXES, TAXES, UP ON TAXES ON TAXES..
    CALIF. IS GOING UP TO 10% SALES TAX... WE PAY TAXES, TAXES. TAXES... FOR WHAT??????

    Now we here the CHANGES ALREADY to use the borrowed funds not for WHITE construction workers.... the verbalige to not choose quality but welfare people who may not do the job as well as the knowledgeable white experienced worker.
    Hello??? What is going on here. YOU SPEND YOUR OWN MONEY not ours for less quality workers.
    WE work hard for all of these things.... what will we do?? Whatever we need to preserve our freedom and rights.
    I am a wife, Mom, Grandmom and now Great Grandmom.... I want to live in a free America with scruples, intelligent leaders who truly care about our country and freedom for all and may the best man or woman for the job be chosen for any position.

    A concerned Californian and American who loves this country and wants to say I'm proud of our government.... of the people, by the people and for the people. Not their own pocket books first.
    Sincerely,

    Delores Ryder-Liboff, Woodland Hills, Ca

    p.s. I just received the forwarded piece from one of my sons who among millions of others who see the changes that are frighteningly leading to complete government control.
    **********************************************
    My son who sent the email is an Electrical Contractor sent me an email regarding his daughters Jr Hi and also stats regarding the lack of opportunity for white kids... hello... and what is being spent on illegals from across our borders with privileges who do not work or support our state and country via slave taxes.
    PLEASE HOLD THE LINE on state spending, borrowing and this if you agree the email contents. Why can't we do a Sarah thing with our Oil Companies and return money to your Ca. people?????
    We appreciate you and all you have and will do to help us regain our pride and freedom to build our dream.... not reward the ones who do not work and pay taxes.
    Thanks, Delores Liboff
  • helen · 9 months ago
    Instead of whining and complaining about how illiegals are taking your jobs away, getting union pay,and making your tax dollars slave money; why don't you question why and how so many companies get away with hiring illiegals. Ask instead why these companies are not checking social security cards which can easily by done via the Web. Companies that employ these people should be held accountable, they would not come if they could not work and they cannot get welfare if they don't have a SS # which a government offices of all places can verify. Quit complaining about people who are trying to improve their lives and start raising your voice against the big business that are doing this to you. Until government makes it unprofitable for companies to hire illegals this issue will always be with us so strike the true culprits not the people who are hoping for a better life. Surely you remember what the Statue of Liberty stands for. Attack the companies they keep the illegals coming.
  • syd · 11 months ago
    Yeah....I thought obama would not do what bush did and hire people without the requisite experience. What's up with that from Obama? And, isnt there something the congress can do????Syd
  • syd · 11 months ago
    Dianne: Why r us 'backing down' from the Panetta confirmation?We DO need an intelligence pro heading up the CIA!!! Of course. Why cant you suggest this to obama???

    AND you NEED to impeach bush, cheney, rumsfeld etc. All the corrupt, lying, TORTURING and thieving cronies in the bush admin. This is a REMEDEY of the people. Not really your choice. It is your Duty. You cannot let them have stepped all over the bill of rights and constitution, robbing from middle america to give to the wealthy. LYING ABOUT SO MUCH WITH NO transparancy.. IMPEACH them. They are NOT ABOVE THE LAW. Deborah Heitter, R.N.
  • LA · 10 months ago
    It's Senator Feinstein, not President Feinstein, she should keep her big mouth closed until the confirmation herrings and address Mr.Panetta with her concerns rather than BITCH publicly because she got her toes stepped on_poor baby.

    Mr.Panetta confirmation should be interesting given that he has worked closely with the UFO "Disclosure Project" and as far as I know is still of the mind that the Government should make public it's files on the issue as so many other countries have been doing recently.
  • Joe Evans · 10 months ago
    02-06-2009

    My name is Joe Evans and I am the father of Tobin Evans.
    This letter is in reference to the sub prim lending, predatory lending and illegal foreclosure of my sons home and property. Please review his dilemma and comment on his options . Toby has no savings, lost all of his equity and has been rejected by attorneys who don’t take contingent cases or who don’t want to take on the “big dogs”.

    Briefly, in 1989 Toby purchased a home on three lots. In 2000 Ocwen failed to pay property taxes from Toby’s impound account. In 2004 Toby was notified the taxes were delinquent four years. In 2005 Toby refinanced to bring the taxes current and stop a tax lien sale. In the process of transferring the note the banks failed to credit several payments causing defaults. In the past three years there have been 12 banks and /or mortgage servicing companies and 16 title companies involved in the transfers of this property. Such as Ocwen, Advanta, Recon Trust, Greenich, Sierra National, Old Republic, Amresco, Citicorp, Aegis, Mers, Countrywide and Bank of New York. In August 2006, the property was wrongfully transferred to Siera National without notifying Toby of an account number. His August, September, and October payments were returned causing default and subsequent unlawful detainer court case. In June of 2007, another transfer to CWABS Bank of New York who claimed 100% ownership and began foreclosure proceedings.

    September 10, 2007, Richard Andrews, an attorney, said he would represent Toby pro bono and he believed that the case had merit indicating possible charges. The allegations are: (but not limited to) 1. Predatory lending, 2. Violation of RESPA #6 and #10, 3. Breach of contract
    4. Misuse of many state laws, 5. Giving false information to the court. Toby thought Mr. Andrews was in control, however, he failed to make court communications. On December 10, 2007 he said he had terminal cancer and could no longer represent Toby, leaving him without legal advice.

    During that period of time there was also a National Disaster from October 22, to November 1, 2007. Due to the Grass Valley Fire in San Bernardino, California, Toby’s community was evacuated. The Post Office closure stopped all mail service including notices of court hearings.
    The court case # UDSS702508 in Central District Civil Division, San Bernardino County, California for the Summary Judgment was not received in a timely manner due to community evacuation. The Bank of New York is now 100% sole owner of the house not just the note holder. Toby and his family were locked out of the house with all their belongings inside on November 30, 2007, four days before the court date to reschedule the Summary Judgment on December 4, 2007. Toby has a paper trail showing dollar amounts, interest rates, note turnovers and charges since 1989.

    Tobin Joe Evans, Plaintiff
    Mailing address: P. O. Box 555, Twin Peaks, CA 92391
    E mail : jayleenc4@hotmail.com Phone: 909-338-5930
    Property address: 22853 Alder Lane, Valley of Enchantment, Crestline, California 92325

    Legal description: Lot 1, Block 1, Book 24, Page 30, and 31. Map of Valley of Enchantment Park Annex, Rim of the World, California, County of San Bernardino.
    Lot 1: 0304204010000, Lot 2: 03042020000, Lot 3: 0304204030000.

    Joe M. Evans, Father, Retired Phone: 520-399-2005
    1600 W. Camino Urbano, Green Valley, AZ, 85614 E mail : jojonjudy@cox.net
  • my · 10 months ago
    Idiot Penetta uses "new interogation tool" , that Obama alredy advertised, namely his fake prick , linked via satellite signal to the victim. One thing about his is that he doen s not even get how it moves and than apologizes. SO MUCH FOR PENETTA INTEROGATION WITHPOIT A WARNING.

    He is not a secret either - rat on his interogation - he can not do it!

    THANKS TO THE CONFLICT THEY HAVE, I AM INTEROGATED AT LEAST SINCE 1968 ON OFF

    PENETTA DOES IT LIKE THAT!

    The fact how oblivious he is about what i=he is doing is pathetic. He needs eldery nursery first.

    mymy