-
Website
http://washingtonindependent.com/ -
Original page
http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=11785 -
Subscribe
All Comments -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
nbc1
409 comments · 2 points
-
RedGraham
360 comments · 6 points
-
naturalizedcitizen
519 comments · 12 points
-
jjfitz
336 comments · 18 points
-
24AheadDotCom
327 comments · 27 points
-
-
Popular Threads
-
Orly Taitz Smacked Down: Birther Lawsuit Dismissed
1 week ago · 2015 comments
-
Four Weeks Later, Senate Unanimously Passes Bill Extending Unemployment Benefits
3 days ago · 225 comments
-
House Passes Extended Unemployment Benefits
3 days ago · 106 comments
-
Unemployment Tops 10 Percent
2 days ago · 47 comments
-
Orly Taitz, Master Attorney
3 weeks ago · 763 comments
-
Orly Taitz Smacked Down: Birther Lawsuit Dismissed
The Ohio SOS has just been ordered to verify thousands of ballots.
Of course she (a Dem) is appealing that ruling.
OBAMA DONASTES $800,000 TO acorn
OBAMA ONCE REPRESENTED ACORN
PELOSI TRIED EARNMARK MILLIONS TO ACORN IN THE BAILOUT BILL
ACORN FILED THOUSANDS OF FRAUDULENT VOTER REGISTRATIONS IN FAVOR OF OBAMA
Give me a break, these people are criminals and they are on obviously the DNC payroll. People need to go to jail for this!
One case showed one man, a guy who works in a pizza shop voting in a couple different counties in his state. IF thats not voter fraud Mr. Eviatar, then what is?
Please. If they weren't trying to cheat the system intentionally, then they were being irresponsible with the public trust. Either way, this looks bad for a group that Barack Obama has exteremely close ties to.
Man Overboard,
By your reasoning we are all guilty by association. I paid my taxes and what kind of country did I get. Am I guilty for being loyal and responsible if it turns out that I am being led by a wolf in sheeps clothing and my country collapses after 8 years? If I stand up for someone's rights as an advocate for that person, should I let my prejudice or dislike of that person get in the way? Come on now. Let's grow up and start using our brains.
Are you serious?! I have personally seen local elections in which persons inhabiting the local cemetery were listed as actually voting! Now, if your assertion holds true then those voters actually rose from the dead to exercise their voting privileges. Or, the alternative is that SOMEONE ELSE voted in their name. Which is the more rational explanation, in your opinion?
http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/local/206969_dead...
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/ar...
http://therealnews.com/t/index.php?option=com_c...
You say the Republicans have two goals. I actually see a third. When the McCain-Palin ticket loses in November, you'll hear howls of vioter fraud because their candidates lost. And then Rush Limbaugh and FOX News will beat that drum for the first four years of the Obama-Biden Administration.
Mark my words. That's what the future holds.
Sincere thanks :-)
I hope.
"Obama used this in Kenya" whatever you mean with by this should be backed up with some proof. Otherwise it is worthless.
'Internet information without validation is vapor-mation'
Do invalid registrations game the system? Yes: students are only allowed to register at their legal residence, which for out of state residents is typically parents. And since many places no longer require verification of ID, a person can multiply register using two names or addresses... and get away with it.
Is it happening? YES. We're already seeing convictions.
Sorry, Daphne, you blew it.
"Yes: students are only allowed to register at their legal residence, which for out of state residents is typically parents"
Incorrect according to a 1997 Supreme Court ruling -
http://supreme.justia.com/us/439/1105/case.html
"And since many places no longer require verification of ID, a person can multiply register using two names or addresses"
Misleading and untruthful. Your statement implies that ID was once necessary. Not true. It has been a recent push by the Failure Party to require ID fueled by their false claims of voter fraud that has caused ID to now be required. http://www.politicalaffairs.net/article/view/41...
"Internet information without validation is vapor-mation"
Sorry, Mr Pete, you are wrong.
Who says? With Democrats fighting to ensure that IDs are not required to vote, those "non-existent people" may very well be voting.
After hearing how ACORN manages the issue of registrations they are unable to validate. I learned they divide them into a 'suspect' pile to make it easier for the election board to then check on.
It sounds like the reporter 'sneeked a peak' of a pile without permission and it turned out to be the 'suspect' pile.
"Internet information without validation is vapor-mation"
CNN is outrageous. Why not interview someone from Acorn?
Secondly, have any of you fracks been to Las Vegas from mid-April to mid October? It's hotter than a Republican seeing the presidency slipping away. It's not right what the workers did, but I understand why they'd make up names in a cool library instead of earning their pay. What it comes down to is that ACORN has been consistently trying to be above board, informing state officials of discrepancies as soon as they find out, for over a year, yet the Republican officials essentially do nothing until now? Why would ACORN in any shape or form condone any type of fraud when it would only hurt the integrity of their organization? Please spare me your indignation over the fraud.
Keep in mind that this ACORN incident pales in comparison to the actual voter disenfranchisement that happened in Vegas back in 2004 or 2006. I don't remember the particulars, but a company with fairly extensive Republican and conservative ties would register people to vote under the impression of being a non-partisan organization, but then they would take registrations of Democrats and throw them away. These weren't made up people, but actual citizens disenfranchised for partisan power purposes.
Thirdly, most of you would want the baby thrown out with the bath water. Of course you would, because you don't believe in democratic principles of all citizens getting a vote. But I digress. What is more harmful: correcting this "wrong" by invalidating all the registrations of this organization, or disenfranchising thousands and thousands of citizens from voter rolls because a few hundred non-existent people are listed (who will non-existently "vote" come election day)? Keep in mind that people of all parties were registered by this organization--it wasn't a partisan effort. If poor people and minorites happen to lean Democrat, it is only a reflection of inequitable Republican policies.
Finally, you geniuses need to realize you're in the age of computers. It is a lot easier to commit fraud hacking the computer systems of the voting machines than trying to have some conspiracy of registering several hundred non-existent voters. It's the turn of the century, all right, but you're 100 years behind. Americans need to be more worried about practically untraceable system hacking that UC scientists have uncovered and demonstrated. Guess who has deep ties to the companies that deploy the electronic voting systems. Jesus I detest feckless fools with no sense of citizenship and fair play, only caring if their "team" wins (as if all this were just some NFL game, rah rah). You have no integrity.